Deutsche Welle, 27 July 2013
Barack Obama has said that approval of the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to the US is dependent on it not increasing greenhouse gas emissions. But the oil inside it, from Canada, could be the real problem.
Barack Obama has said that approval of the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to the US is dependent on it not increasing greenhouse gas emissions. But the oil inside it, from Canada, could be the real problem.
"The
water's been polluted so badly, you can't drink out of any of the creeks, or
even the wells," Violet Cheecham Clarke explains. The 85-year-old is among
the elders of a tribe known as Fort McMurray No. 468, in Alberta.
"Nowadays, you can't even give the water to your animals."
The
sprightly old lady with dark grey hair has seen the world, also having lived in
Germany for some years. She's been fighting to prevent the water in her native
home from getting polluted by the oil, often in vain, she says.
![]() |
The Cheecham family is concerned about environmental impacts |
Not many
First Nation peoples have profited from the tar sands operation, which has
meanwhile made the neighboring town of Fort McMurray wealthy. Corruption is
everywhere, people here say.
Water-intensive
process
The tar
sands were first tapped in Alberta in 1967, after it was discovered that the
soil in Canada's northwest is soaked in black gold. It took several decades,
however, to develop a technique cheap enough to make separating the oil from
the soil profitable. The oil only makes up about 10 percent of the volume.
Generally
the oil is heated to liquid by steam in underground pipes or the earth is
excavated and then washed to separate the oil, as in pit mining. One thing
required for both is a vast amount of water, which in this case comes from the
Athabasca River.
What's left
over is a sludgy mix of water, sand and bitumen, which is stored in so-called
tailing ponds, for example north of Fort McMurray. The landscape there is
marked by many such toxic tailing ponds, and also by huge heaps of tailings, as
unwanted leftovers from mining are called.
![]() |
Sandy wasteland left over after tar sands processing, where the oil has been removed |
Stringham
told DW that all the water in the tailings ponds is recycled, and not left to
soak into the environment. A layer of mud seals the underside of the pond off
from the water table according to Stringham.
High cancer
rate
But
environmental investigator Tony Boschmann doesn't believe Stringham's claims.
He not only thinks that the official estimate of 2.7 barrels of fresh water
usage for each barrel of oil produced is too low, he also believes the river is
getting polluted.
"The
chemistry of the water coming into the bottom of the river is completely
different to what was in the river,'" Boschmann told DW.
Boschmann,
at 53, is an expert at hunting polluters. But he said that the government has
not been keen to follow up, also in this case. "We've brought it to the
attention of the authorities, and we'd hoped that they would investigate this
more deeply and fully," Boschmann said. "We've since realized that
there's very little interest in showing anything negative in the oil sands
domain."
Medical
doctor John O'Connor is also concerned. He's been serving the Fort McKay area,
north of Fort McMurray, for 15 years. He's also familiar with the medical
situation in Fort Chipewyan, a nearby settlement accessible only by boat or
plane.
![]() |
Environmental investigator Tony Boschmann believes the tailings ponds are leaking |
The
authorities have been absent from dealing with this phenomenon, O'Connor said.
"I'm very disgusted with the lack of action, the lack of interest,"
he added. At the same time, he admits that Alberta in general and Fort McMurray
have profited from the extraction of oil from the tar sands. There's more
education than before, life expectancy is higher and also the standard of
living has generally risen.
A dirty
fuel
The alleged
water pollution isn't the only problem with the tar sands - it's also a
comparatively dirty fuel. Greg Stringham of the Canadian Association of
Petroleum Producers admits that per barrel of tar sands oil, six to nine
percent more greenhouse gases are emitted than from oil, both light and heavy,
coming into the US.
![]() |
An oil sands refinery and tailings pond, located north of Fort McMurray |
Mining of
Canada's oil sands is due to continue, to the tune of about 1.8 million barrels
daily, Stringham said. That makes up almost half of Canada's total production.
By 2030, production is supposed to rise to 6.7 million barrels, with the goal
of this oil reaching refineries and ports in the Gulf of Mexico.
But in
order for that to happen, the Keystone XL Pipeline will have to be built
through the United States. At the moment, US President Barack Obama's
administration is still set to make the decision on that, after environmental
impact studies have been carried out.
Barack Obama expresses reservations about Keystone XL pipeline project
Has Canada's government been muzzling its scientists?
Related Articles:
Barack Obama expresses reservations about Keystone XL pipeline project
Has Canada's government been muzzling its scientists?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.