Srekor
village has stood on the banks of the Se San River in northeastern Cambodia for
generations. In a few years it will be gone, submerged along with more than 300
square kilometres of surrounding farmland and forest.
Work has
started on the Lower Se San 2 Dam, a 400-megawatt hydropower project whose vast
reservoir will force thousands to move.
For
37-year-old rice farmer Pa Tou, the future looks bleak. The relocation site set
aside for them is wholly unsuitable, he complains. There is no irrigation, it is
miles from the river and the ground is either rocky or covered with trees. And
at this stage it has no schools, no health clinics, no pagodas and no roads.
“Everyone
here worries how we will make a living,” he says.
Fish
highways
Scientists
share Pa Tou's pessimism about the $800-million Lower Se San 2 Dam, but note
that its effects will be felt far beyond Srekor. That is because the Se San
River, which the dam will block, is a vital breeding ground for fish in the
region.
Dr Eric
Baran, the senior research scientist at WorldFish, an NGO focused on food
security, describes the Se San River as one of four “fish highways” in the
Lower Mekong Basin. Along with the Sre Pok River and the Se Kong Rivers, both
of which flow into the Se San, this collection of three tributaries is known as
the 3S network and is where migratory fish breed.
The fourth
highway is the Mekong, into which the 3S network empties.
The Lower
Se San 2 Dam, which will be built downstream of the confluence of the Sre Pok
and Se San rivers, will completely block two of these fish highways. By the
time its 8-kilometre-long wall is finished, only the Mekong and the Se Kong
will remain open to the 40 percent of the fish in the Mekong Basin that are
migratory.
![]() |
There will be agricultural losses too, say development experts |
“So it's
9.3 percent of 2.1 million tons – which is a gigantic amount,” Baran says.
That amount
of lost catch – around 200,000 tons per year – is more than Australia's annual
marine catch.
Regional
effects
The Lower
Mekong Basin is home to tens of millions of people, many of them poor. For
Cambodia, whose per capita freshwater fish consumption is higher than any other
nation, hydropower dams will affect food security.
“People
have become very reliant on [fish, which are] also by far the first source of
animal protein,” says Baran. “[Fish] represent 81 percent of the animal protein
consumption in the country.”
A paper
published last year in the respected US journal The Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences warned that the region's scramble for hydropower would have
a “catastrophic” impact on the Mekong Basin, which is the world's richest
freshwater fishery.
The
researchers calculated that plans to build more than 70 dams in the Mekong
River Basin would be disastrous. Baran, who co-wrote the paper, says the Lower
Se San 2 Dam will be the most damaging of any tributary dam.
Global
concern
The
research has spurred global concern. Last year, the then US Secretary of State,
Hillary Clinton, urged Mekong nations not to make the same mistakes regarding
dams as the US had made.
International
Rivers, a campaigning NGO, predicts the Lower Se San 2 Dam “will have a costly,
catastrophic impact on the Mekong River's fisheries and biodiversity”.
“All of the
research that has come out has proven that the impact of the dam will be much
greater than the benefits of the project,” says Ame Trandem, the Southeast Asia
program director for International Rivers.
Trandem
says there will be agricultural losses too, with the Lower Se San 2 Dam
calculated to block up to 8 percent of sediment flows on the Mekong. These
nutrients are vital for fertilizing the fields of countless thousands of
subsistence farmers.
“So this is
something that will affect all of the rice fields in Cambodia going down to the
Mekong Delta in Vietnam as well,” she says.
The expected
effects of the Lower Se San 2 Dam are so severe that in late 2011 a group of 29
international scientists with expertise in fisheries wrote to Cambodia's Prime
Minister Hun Sen warning that the dam would harm hundreds of thousands of
people in Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand and Laos.
![]() |
'Love Mekong, No Dam' |
The letter
stressed their “sincere concern” that this dam would cause “increased poverty
and malnutrition over a wide area in Cambodia, thus working against the
Cambodian government's development plans for the nation, including its efforts
to achieve UN Millennium Development Goals”.
The
scientists reportedly did not receive a response.
Government
silence
Cambodia
and its neighbors certainly need more power: three-quarters of Cambodians lack
access to the grid, and power cuts in cities and towns are common.
Although
hydropower is a source of clean electricity, its detractors say the social and
environmental costs of large projects like this one outweigh the benefits. They
say small schemes such as solar, wind and micro-hydro dams that generate energy
locally are better because they cost less, lose less electricity in
transmission and have fewer negative effects.
Yet,
Cambodia has only a handful of such projects and they do not appear to be part
of the government's energy policy. The Minister of Industry, Mines and Energy,
Suy Sem, declined to be interviewed for this article, as did another senior
ministry official. Questions emailed to the minister were not answered.
But media
reports consistently show the government favors projects like hydropower dams
and coal-fired power stations. More are likely to go ahead. On May 9, the
Cambodia Daily newspaper said two more planned dams on the 3S network had been
deemed economically feasible, moving them a step closer to approval. One would
be a 370MW dam on the Se San River; the other a 100MW dam on the Sre Pok River.
The first would flood 40 villages alone.
Meanwhile the
Cambodian government has plans to build a hydropower dam on its stretch of the
Se Kong River, which rises in Laos. Baran says that would block the region's
third fish highway, leaving the Mekong mainstream as the sole route for
migratory species, further harming fish stocks. The rush to hydropower risks
inflicting profound and irreversible damage to many more people than the
residents of Srekor village.
Related Articles:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.