guardian.co.uk,
Reuters, Monday 22 October 2012
![]() |
A bumblebee collecting pollen. Photograph: Alamy |
Pesticides
used in farming are also killing worker bumblebees and damaging their ability
to gather food, meaning colonies that are vital for plant pollination are more
likely to fail when they are used, a study showed on Sunday.
The United
Nations has estimated that one-third of all plant-based foods eaten by people
depend on bee pollination and scientists have been baffled by plummeting
numbers of bees, mainly in North America and Europe, in recent years.
British
scientists said they exposed colonies of 40 bumblebees, which are bigger than
the more common honeybee, to the pesticides neonicotinoid and pyrethroid over
four weeks at levels similar to those in fields.
Neonicotinoids
are nicotine-like chemicals used to protect various crops from locusts, aphids
and other pests.
"Chronic
exposure … impairs natural foraging behaviour and increases worker mortality,
leading to significant reductions in brood development and colony
success," the scientists wrote in the report in the journal Nature on
Sunday.
Exposure to
a combination of the two pesticides "increases the propensity of colonies
to fail", according to the researchers at Royal Holloway, University of
London.
A 2011 UN
report estimated that bees and other pollinators such as butterflies, beetles
or birds do work worth €153bn ($200bn) a year to the human economy and are in
decline in many nations.
The
findings underscored the importance of wider testing of pesticides to ensure
they do not also target bees, it said.
France
banned a neonicotinoid pesticide made by Swiss agrochemicals group Syngenta in
June, citing evidence of a threat to the country's bees. A report last month,
however, said that the original research was flawed.
"My
guess is that the decline of bees is like a jigsaw -there are probably a lot of
pieces to put into place. This is probably a very important piece of that
jigsaw," lead author Richard Gill said.
In a
separate commentary in Nature, Juliet Osborne of the University of Exeter in
England said the study underscored the need to understand all factors that may
contribute to harm bees and to "colony collapse disorder".
"For
example, we have as yet no convincing demonstration of the relative effects of
pesticides on bee colonies compared to the effects of parasites, pathogens and
foraging resources," she wrote.
Gill
endorsed recommendations by the European Food Safety Authority for longer
testing on adult bees and larvae, new ways of assessing cumulative exposure to
toxins and separate assessments for different bee species.
He said
previous studies had mostly examined the impact of pesticides on individual
bees, rather than colonies. Bumblebees form colonies of a few dozen bees, while
honeybees can number up to tens of thousands.
"Effects
at the individual level can have a major knock-on effect at the colony level.
That's the novelty of the study," he said.
The average
number of bees lost in the experiment - both dead in the nesting box and
failing to return - was about two-thirds of the total for bees exposed to a
combination of the two pesticides against a third for a control, exposed to
neither.
Bumblebees
exposed to a combination of pesticides were about half as successful at
gathering pollen, used as food, compared to a control. They also devoted more
workers to collecting food, meaning fewer were raising larvae.
A study published in the journal Science in March showed for the first time that
pesticides seriously harm bees by damaging their ability to navigate home.
Other
experts said more research was needed. "It certainly wouldn't be fair to
say that this research spells doom for wild bees," said James Cresswell of
the University of Exeter.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.